Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Stephanie C. Artis v. District of Columbia
Paid petition · District of Columbia Court of Appeals, No. 15-CV-0243 · judgment April 7, 2016
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for no court below (an original writ).
Question presented
Section 1367 of Title 28 authorizes federal district courts in certain circumstances to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over claims arising under State law. Section 1367 further provides that "[t]he period of limitations for any [such] claim ...shall be tolled while the claim is pending and for a period of 30 days after it is dismissed unless State law provides for a longer tolling period." 28 U.S.C. § 1367(d). The question presented is whether the tolling provision in §1367(d) suspends the limitations period for the state-law claim while the claim is pending and for thirty days after the claim is dismissed, or whether the tolling provision does not suspend the limitations period but merely provides 30 days beyond the dismissal for the plaintiff to refile.
Similar questions
Other petitions whose question is worded like this one.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Adam G. Unikowsky
Jenner & Block LLP
For respondent
Loren L. AliKhan
D.C. Office of the Attorney General
Case
Subject area
Judicial Power (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 3 conferences
Amicus briefs
2 merits
(2 respondent)
Argument & decision
Argued November 1, 2017 — Adam G. Unikowsky · Loren L. AliKhan. Listen and read along · the Court’s audio
Decided January 22, 2018. Opinion by Ginsburg.
Proceedings
- Feb 23 2018MANDATE ISSUED.
- Feb 23 2018JUDGMENT ISSUED.
- Jan 22 2018Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Gorsuch, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito, JJ., joined.
- Nov 01 2017Argued. For petitioner: Adam G. Unikowsky, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Loren L. AliKhan, Deputy Solicitor General, Washington, D. C.
- Sep 25 2017Motion of Wisconsin and 23 other states for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae and for divided argument DENIED.
- Sep 12 2017Record requested from the D.C. Court of Appeals.
- Sep 11 2017Reply of petitioner Stephanie C. Artis filed. (Distributed)
- Sep 07 2017CIRCULATED
- Aug 31 2017SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, November 1, 2017
- Aug 18 2017Motion of Wisconsin and 23 other states for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae and for divided argument filed.
- Aug 18 2017Brief amici curiae of National Conference of State Legislatures, et al. filed.
- Aug 18 2017Brief amici curiae of Wisconsin and 23 other states filed.
- Aug 11 2017Brief of respondent District of Columbia filed.
- May 30 2017Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.
- May 25 2017Brief of petitioner Stephanie C. Artis filed.
- May 11 2017Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Stephanie C. Artis.
- Mar 29 2017The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including May 25, 2017.
- Mar 29 2017The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 11, 2017.
- Feb 27 2017Petition GRANTED.
- Feb 21 2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 24, 2017.
- Jan 18 2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 17, 2017.
- Jan 17 2017Reply of petitioner Stephanie C. Artis filed.
- Jan 04 2017Brief of respondent District of Columbia in opposition filed.
- Dec 01 2016Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 4, 2017.
- Nov 03 2016Response Requested. (Due December 5, 2016)
- Nov 02 2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 22, 2016.
- Oct 19 2016Waiver of right of respondent District of Columbia to respond filed.
- Oct 06 2016Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 7, 2016)