Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Leo Louis Kaczmar, III v. Florida, et al.

IFP petition · Supreme Court of Florida, No. SC2022-1671, SC2023-0725 · judgment February 19, 2026


Pending

Questions presented

CAPITAL CASE

  1. Does the Sixth Amendment right to a properly instructed jury and the right to Due Process under the Fifth Amendment include the right to have the jury instructed on the prohibition against using electronic media to investigate the case when every jurisdiction in the United States, state and federal, requires this instruction?

  2. Does the failure to properly instruct the jury as outlined above, coupled with the trial court’s refusal to allow jury interviews about the effect of that failure to instruct the jury, obviate the need to satisfy the prejudice requirement under Strickland when such a regime makes an inquiry impossible?

  3. Does the failure to object to a prohibited instruction regarding a prior jury’s recommendation of death likewise require a finding of ineffective assistance of counsel when no inquiry on the effect of the instruction on the jury (the prejudice component of Strickland) is permitted?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Robert R. Berry
Law Office of Robert R. Berry

For respondent
Scott Andrew Browne
Office of the Attorney General

Case

Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 08 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2026.
  2. Oct 01 2026
    Reply of petitioner Leo Louis Kaczmar filed.
  3. Sep 18 2026
    Brief of respondents Florida, et al. in opposition filed.
  4. Jul 13 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 1, 2026)