Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Gerard Eric Beasley v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 24-12004 · judgment April 7, 2026
Question presented
In the past year, this Court has twice summarily reversed the Fourth Circuit for violating the partypresentation principle. Margolin v. Nat’l Ass’n of Immigr. Judges, 146 S. Ct. 1285 (2026); Clark v. Sweeney, 607 U.S. 7 (2025). Under that principle, parties frame the issue and courts decide that issue. Here, the parties argued only whether Petitioner Gerard Eric Beasley’s second confession retained the taint of his earlier involuntary confession. Neither party addressed harmlessness or the admissibility of the firearm found in his car. Yet the Eleventh Circuit affirmed on that unbriefed ground, declining to answer the briefed issue and instead holding that admitting the second confession was harmless based on the admissibility of the firearm. The question presented is: Whether the decision below should be summarily reversed as a violation of the party-presentation principle.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Matthew D. Cavender
Office of the Federal Defender (MDFL)
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Proceedings
- Sep 03 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Aug 31 2026Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Aug 21 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 25, 2026)
- Jun 17 2026Application (25A1405) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until August 26, 2026.
- Jun 15 2026Application (25A1405) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 27, 2026 to August 26, 2026, submitted to Justice Thomas.