Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Isaiah Neal v. Troy E. Meink, Secretary of the Air Force, et al.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 24-1286, 24-2403 · judgment November 17, 2025
Questions presented
-
Whether the Ninth Circuit’s requirement that Title VII plaintiffs make a “specific and substantial” showing of pretext to survive summary judgment is in direct conflict with Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 530 U.S. 133 (2000), and with the First, Fifth, Seventh, and D.C. Circuits, which hold that no such pretext showing is required.
-
Whether, under Article III and the party-presentation principle recognized in United States v. Sineneng-Smith, 590 U.S. 371 (2020), a federal court of appeals may affirm a dispositive judgment on the basis that the district court raised sua sponte and that no party raised or had a meaningful opportunity to contest.”
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Isaiah Neal
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Proceedings
- Sep 03 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Aug 27 2026Waiver of right of respondent Meink, Troy E., et al. to respond filed.
- Jul 23 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 21, 2026)
- Jun 08 2026Application (25A1361) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 23, 2026.
- May 13 2026Application (25A1361) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 24, 2026 to July 23, 2026, submitted to Justice Kagan.