William Ronald Clark v. Wyoming Department of Corrections, et al.

The first question would be why would a federal judge and the court of appeals refuse to address a medical issue that relates to death if un treated? I have a 2 and 1/2 inch tare in my stomach lining ware my intestines' are busting through my stomach wall. This is also the first rate killer of big dogs if untreated. I was told by the prison doctor that its to much to fix so get it fix when i get out. I am serving a life with out parole, so as of right now I'm never getting out. The federal judge and the court of appeals also refused to address the fact I was told by the same medical staff to use butter off my prison tray for a skin rash/problem to ware my skin was breaking and splitting and bleeding, I have that in righting from prison medical on a medical kite I summitted as exhibits in all of my filings with all courts. The funny thing is they do not even put butter on the tray at all. second question to the court would be why would a federal judge and the court of appeals refuse to fix or even address a clear cut violation of the constitution, to ware prison staff were destroying federal forms sent to them by a federal judge. For the purpose to be filled out and signed by prison staff. Those papers were pretraining to a inmate serving a life sentence and the non signing and the none returning of those papers would result in that inmate being time barred and dyeing in prison with no further action of appeals do to the fact of the destruction of those documents and that inmate being time barred for life. The plaintiff in this case has submitted proof of these infractions with staff willingly ready to testify to the prison doing those things. MS. Burk the legal library staff member delivered those federal form to the head office by hand and they still destroyed them, further proof I have a state Email sent to the warden and the business office by case worker Blackford about this federal form they refused to even reply. For the courts knowledge I am currently fighting for my life in a federal court and am fighting a motion to dismiss for exhaustion reason in a habaeus because of these in fractions by Rawlings state prison. Third question to the court, is why would the prison mail room hold and destroy legal mail. I have correction officer Bynum and Officer white and a S.G.T that will tell this court my legal mail was being tampered with opened photo copied out of my site re tapped and given to me. this was so bluntly done that the mail room staff tried to get the correction officers i just explained about to give me my legal mail so they would not be held responsible for the violations that is why the correction officers are willing to tell the court what the prison mail staff were doing. LAST THE PLAINTIFF ASK'S THE COURT. Why if a inmate shows harassments and denial of rights would a lower court state i did not state a claim that could be granted? when i only asked for medical treatment and my constitutional rights to be up held?