Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Leslie M. Anthony v. United Airlines, Incorporated
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 24-2128 · judgment January 6, 2026
Questions presented
-
Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 permits courts to reject a retaliation claim at summary judgment by discounting sworn testimony as “self-serving” and demanding documentary corroboration (such as emails or phone records) before a jury may draw reasonable inferences in the employee’s favor.
-
Whether a Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 retaliation claim in a workplace with layered decisionmaking may be defeated by requiring proof that the final signatory personally knew of protected activity, rather than permitting knowledge and causation to be established through the participation or influence of management actors with knowledge and through circumstantial evidence.
-
Whether a court of appeals may affirm summary judgment on a merits-dispositive “waiver” theory based on the placement of record citations, where the appellant supplied the record support required by the court’s local rule and clearly presented the issue, thereby foreclosing merits review in a civil rights case.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Carla Dorsey Aikens
Carla D. Aikens, PLC
For respondent
Eric Patrick Burns
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Aug 20 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Aug 19 2026Waiver of right of respondent United Airlines Incorporated to respond filed.
- Apr 06 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 14, 2026)