Randolph Bullock v. United States

Can the United States Sentencing Commission create new penalties (enhancements) via clerical edits / merger of the Guidelines without Congressional direction to do so?

Is Kisor v. Wilkie relevant to judicial review / application of the United States Sentencing Commission Guideline Commentary?

When a Congressional mandate is ambiguous but the United States Sentencing Commission Commentary conflicts with a reasonable (Kisor) analysis of Text, Structure, Purpose, and History of the mandate and Guideline, does Commentary overrule?

When three (3) Circuit Courts hold that USSG §2G2.2(b)(5) Pattern enhancement behavior must be related to the instant offense under a Kisor analysis, and other Circuit Courts hold otherwise, what is the proper requirement to apply the enhancement?

Is it incumbent on today's courts to use tools of Kisor analysis to resolve conflicts and ambiguity in agency rules?

For enhancements that have a substantial impact on a sentencing guideline, does Due Process require proof greater than preponderance of the evidence and require proof by at least clear and convincing evidence?