Jean Max Darbouze v. California

. Whether the failure of the trial and appeallate courts to evaluate material exculpatory evidence submitted by the defense violates the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment.

. Whether as conviction obtained through false testimony, undisclosed inducements, and suppression or disregard of exculpatory evidence vio­ lates clearly established federal law.

. Whether admission of uncertified and unreliable translation evidence without the presence of or qualified interpreter subject to cross-exam­ ination, violates the confrontation clause.

. Whether denial of a requested interpreter to a non-English speaking defendant deprives him of due process and a fair trial.

. Whether ineffective assistance of counsel and failure to address a defendant's mental disability violates the sixth and fourteenth amend­ ments .

. Whether the failure of the trial court and appellate courts allowed the defendant has been charged twice for the offense, same day, same time, same incident, count 4 and count 5. There two criminal threats, those additional illegal charges violates defendant's 6th amendment and 14th amendment rights of the U. S. Constitution. (See attached Exhibit.)