Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Heather A. Boyd v. Department of the Treasury
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2025-1128 · judgment November 6, 2025
Question presented
Introduction* Where is the • - die required documents (tax/source) to support the of the aii'-" n uimu • ■ i. • statements (Joseph Ingalls/Heather Boyd) to support the narrative of IRS Counsel, and a TIGTA (who appears to have to the power to investigate all issues per a congressional act) report for both the state/federal cases? I. Improper Service* Was there improper service of all orders from the lower courts? A. Assertions-Are all of the assertions of Venice "Lim" Hochman inherently implausible? B. Breach-Is there a breach of fiduciary duty/contract by Venice "Lim" Hochman? C. Compliance-Is there compliance with any relevant/applicable laws in the lower courts? D. Damages-Was there damages to petitioner, communities, and the country (the United States of America) by ' . ' Venice "Lim" Hochman?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Heather A. Boyd
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Aug 20 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Aug 13 2026Waiver of right of respondent Department of the Treasury to respond filed.
- Feb 11 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 18, 2026)