Jane Doe v. Jayson Tatum, et al.

Has sex trafficking been legalized by the First Circuit when the First Circuit affirmed the ruling of the District Court that all of the elements of sex trafficking taken together, — with the inclusion of dates, locations, names, conduct, damage, and verified circumstances that make the claim possible — , and asserted to be connected as part of organized sexual abuse that was carried out by the Boston Celtics NBA Franchise and damaged me "fails to state a claim" when assumed to be true? In doing so, have my human rights and constitutional rights been violated? Is allowing the ruling to stand a violation of my human rights and constitutional rights? Is denying me, as the Victim of Sex Trafficking, my right to gather additional evidence to support my claims of sex trafficking and present my "case" to a Jury of my Peers for Judgement, and, instead requiring me to prove my claim to a Federal Judge at the pleading stage, a violation of my human rights and constitutional rights? At what point is denying me, as the Victim of Sex Trafficking, my right to gather additional evidence to support my claims of sex trafficking and present my "case" to a Jury of my Peers for Judgement when I, as the Victim of Sex Trafficking, am without representation, have never been offered or given any legal assistance in getting remedy and relief for the sex trafficking related damages from any governmental or non-governmental organization, and the wrong determination of my "status" has been made and is resulting in more damage to me, a criminal and liable act? What safeguards exist when the United States' system is failing to properly identify a Victim of Sex Trafficking as the Victim of Sex Trafficking during sex trafficking legal proceedings, and is leaving the Victim without assistance from any United States organization while up against a organization as big as a NBA Basketball team? What safeguards exist when the United States' system is failing to properly identify a Victim of Sex Trafficking as the Victim of Sex Trafficking, ongoing damage is taking place (both systematically and deliberately), and the Victim is not living a life they choose with all of their rights? Is allowing an unrepresented Victim of Sexual Trafficking the option to gather more evidence and tell their story to a Jury of Peers without legal nonsense, delays, and the intentional inflection of damage during the legal process a reasonable safeguard to aid in ending sex trafficking worldwide, learning more about how the crime is being committed, and actually helping the Victims? Is not dong so is a violation of this Country's "values and ideals", violation of human and constitutional rights, and violation of guaranteed protections to Victims of these situations under Federal and International Law? Page 2 of 40