Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Marvin Pippins v. United States

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 25-154 · judgment February 3, 2026


Pending

Question presented

I. The most serious of the charges upon which Petitioner was tried concerned his having killed Sean Peart in retaliation for the murder of Petitioner's twin brother, Melly. Count One of Superseding Indictment S-3 charged RICO Conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 1962(d)); Count Two charged Conspiracy to Murder in Aid of Racketeering (18 U.S.C. § 1959(a)(5)); Count Three charged Murder in Aid of Racketeering (18 U.S.C. § 1959(a)(l)); and Count Four charged Unlawful Use of the Firearm (used in Count Three) Resulting in Death (18 U.S.C. § 924G)(l).1 At trial, both during opening statements and during his testimony, Petitioner admitted that he killed Peart but said he did so purely for personal reasons and not because of his affiliation with the named gang, the "5-9 Brims." Substantial evidence supported his position. The government argued otherwise. Petitioner therefore asked the trial court to instruct the jury that to find a sufficient enterprise-related motive it must find it was a "substantial" one or one "integral" to his position in the 5-9 Brims. The court denied this request. It said the proper instruction was subject to "reasonable debate" (Tr. 1826); (Pet. App. 78a). 2 and it was concerned "there's a possibility that a jury might find that it [i.e., the 5-9 Brims] was a motive but maybe not the substantial motivating factor" and therefore acquit Additionally, Count Six charged Petitioner with Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substances (21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(b)(l)(C)), and Count Seven charged him with Unlawful Use of a Firearm (18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(l)(A)(i)). Petitioner was not charged in Count Five and Counts Eight through Eleven. 2 Citations to "Tr." or a number refer to the trial transcript from the lower court proceedings. Certain transcript excerpts are reproduced herein as part of Petitioner's Appendix.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Richard Ware Levitt
Levitt & Kaizer

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Linked docket
25A1347

Proceedings

  1. Aug 13 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
  2. Aug 05 2026
    Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
  3. Jul 09 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 14, 2026)
  4. Jun 04 2026
    Application (25A1347) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until July 9, 2026.
  5. May 28 2026
    Application (25A1347) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 9, 2026 to July 9, 2026, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.