In Re Jesse Randolph Curry, Jr.

(A) Has the Fifth Circuit entered a decision in "CONFLICT" with her sister circuits and lower federal courts, on the same important issues, of wheather A.E.D.P.A.'s successive petition rules apply to "BRADY" and "NAPUE" violations that were "NOT RIPE" at the time of the initial petition, based on "NEWLY DISCOVERED" DNA forensic test evidence; (B) Has the Fifth Circuit entered a ruling that "CONTRAVENS" United States Supreme Court "PRECEDENT" set in Panetti V. Quarterman, on wheather A.E.D.P.A.'s successive petition rules apply to violations that were "NOT RIPE" at the time of the initial habeas petition, based on "BRADY" and "NAPUE" violations shown by NEWLY DISCOVERED FORENSIC DNA TEST EVIDENCE; (C) Has the Fifth Circuit entered a decision in "CONFLICT" with its sister circuits and lower federal courts, on the same "IMPORTANT ISSUES" of wheather A.E.D.P.A.'s successive petition rules apply to § 60 (b), § 60 (d) (3), "FRAUD UPON THE COURT" violations that demonstrate EGREGIOUS, "intentionally fraudulent conduct directed at state and federal courts; (D) Has the Fifth Circuit entered a ruling that "CONTRAVENS" United States Supreme Court "PRECEDENT" on wheather A.E.D.P.A.'s successive petition rules apply to § 60 (b), § 60 (d) (3), "FRAUD UPON THE COURT" where state officers of the court of Texas, did DILIBERATELY PLAN AND EXCUTE A SCHEME TO DEFRAUD STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS.