Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Christopher Dier v. Jeff Landry, Governor of Louisiana, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 26-30243 · judgment July 10, 2026


11%
estimated cert probability
(petition-stage, structural)
95% interval 7%–17%

About 2.8× the 4.1% base rate. The model weights this up for counsel who has won certiorari before, a petition filed soon after the judgment below, and a Fifth Circuit decision below, and down for a state or local-government respondent.

Questions presented

Louisiana law requires every public school in the state to display the Ten Commandments in every classroom. La. R.S. § 17:2124(B)(1)-(3). The law mandates a specific version of the Biblical text that includes the statements “I AM the Lord thy God,” “Thou shalt have no other gods before me,” “Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord thy God in vain,” and “Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.” According to the Book of Exodus these and the other Commandments are the literal words of God; “written with the finger of God.” In addition to prescribing the specific Biblical text, Louisiana’s law mandates that God’s words appear on a poster or framed document at least eleven inches by fourteen inches and mandates that they be the central focus of the display in a large, easily readable font. The law also pairs God’s words with a state-written statement titled “The History of the Ten Commandments in American Public Education.” Petitioner Christopher Dier, Louisiana’s 2020 Teacher of the Year, teaches all of his classes in a single public-school classroom. He strongly objects to the message these state-mandated displays convey—that the State officially endorses a particular religion’s authority and moral teachings—and has sworn that he cannot comply with the law, even at the risk of losing his job. Applying recent, binding en banc circuit precedent, the courts below held his challenge unripe and meritless. The questions presented are:

  1. Whether petitioner’s Establishment Clause challenge to Louisiana’s law is ripe.

  2. Whether Louisiana’s law violates the Establishment Clause.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Andrew Timothy Tutt
Trial Lawyers for Justice

For respondent

Case

Conference history

Proceedings

  1. Aug 25 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 28, 2026)