Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Philip S. Liddiard v. Bank of America, N.A.
Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Utah, No. 20251319-CA · judgment December 16, 2025
(petition-stage, structural)
Well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weights this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Questions presented
-
Whether the Due Process Clause permits a state court to rely on constructive notice from pre-judgment filings as notice of a final judgment, where state procedural rules require notice of a judgment once entered.
-
Whether the Due Process Clause permits a state court to deny relief as untimely under Rule 60(c) from a judgment alleged to be void for lack of constitutionally sufficient notice, where the absence of notice caused the delay in seeking relief.
-
Whether the Due Process Clause permits an appellate court to affirm a judgment without addressing a claim that the judgment is void for lack of Due Process.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Philip S. Liddiard
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 14 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2026.
- Jun 09 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 28, 2026)