Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Philip S. Liddiard v. Bank of America, N.A.

Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Utah, No. 20251319-CA · judgment December 16, 2025

estimated cert probability
(petition-stage, structural)

Well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

Whether the Due Process Clause permits a state court to rely on constructive notice from pre-judgment filings as notice of a final judgment, where state procedural rules require notice of a judgment once entered.
Whether the Due Process Clause permits a state court to deny relief as untimely under Rule 60(c) from a judgment alleged to be void for lack of constitutionally sufficient notice, where the absence of notice caused the delay in seeking relief.
Whether the Due Process Clause permits an appellate court to affirm a judgment without addressing a claim that the judgment is void for lack of Due Process.

For petitioner
Philip S. Liddiard

For respondent
—

Conference history
—

Jun 09 2026
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 28, 2026)
Petition Appendix Certificate of Word Count Proof of Service