Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Jaelen M. Johnson v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, No. 25-0202 · judgment May 26, 2026
(petition-stage, structural)
Well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weights this down for a petition under 3,000 words.
Question presented
In addition to warrants issued by a judicial officer, the Military Rules of Evidence (Mil. R. Evid.) allow a military commander to authorize searches of persons and property. The commanders granting these search authorizations are not required to have legal training or experience and, instead, receive advice from a prosecutor on whether to approve the search. The question presented is: Does the Leon good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule apply when law enforcement relies on a commander’s probable cause determination if that commander has no legal training or education and received advice from the same prosecutor who advised law enforcement?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Joshua Leonel Lopes
U.S. Air Force Judge Advocate General's Corps
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 13 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 13, 2026.
- Oct 09 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 14, 2026 to November 13, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
- Sep 14 2026Response Requested. (Due October 14, 2026)
- Sep 02 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Aug 31 2026Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Aug 17 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 18, 2026)