Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Dr. Douglas Schottenstein, et al. v. Orthogen International GmbH

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 25-1253, 25-1258 · judgment April 1, 2026


4%
estimated cert probability
(petition-stage, structural)
Conference-stage estimate: 7%
Rule 10: dissent below
GVR risk 1%

Roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weights this up for a Second Circuit decision below, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and a petition filed soon after the judgment below.

Question presented

28 U.S.C. § 1782 authorizes federal courts to order discovery “for use in a proceeding in a foreign or international tribunal.” The Second Circuit affirmed orders authorizing what it repeatedly called “pre-suit discovery” — Rule 45 subpoenas for use in a “contemplated” private German civil action that Respondent, Orthogen Int’l GmbH, has not filed. The Question Presented is: Whether 28 U.S.C. § 1782 permits a district court to authorize a private foreign party to serve Rule 45 subpoenas for “pre-suit discovery” — to develop unpleaded foreign-law claims against a U.S. resident — in aid of a putative civil action it says it will file in the “conventional courts” of a foreign jurisdiction, where no administrative or quasi-judicial proceeding affords the applicant “significant procedural rights.”

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Edward Daniel Altabet
Brach Eichler

For respondent
Karen R. King
Morvillo Abramowitz Grand Iason & Anello P.C.

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Aug 20 2026
    Reply of petitioners Dr. Douglas Schottenstein, et al. filed. (Distributed)
  2. Aug 19 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
  3. Aug 05 2026
    Brief of respondent Orthogen International GmbH in opposition filed.
  4. Jun 29 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 5, 2026)