Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Dr. Douglas Schottenstein, et al. v. Orthogen International GmbH
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 25-1253, 25-1258 · judgment April 1, 2026
(petition-stage, structural)
Roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weights this up for a Second Circuit decision below, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and a petition filed soon after the judgment below.
Question presented
28 U.S.C. § 1782 authorizes federal courts to order discovery “for use in a proceeding in a foreign or international tribunal.” The Second Circuit affirmed orders authorizing what it repeatedly called “pre-suit discovery” — Rule 45 subpoenas for use in a “contemplated” private German civil action that Respondent, Orthogen Int’l GmbH, has not filed. The Question Presented is: Whether 28 U.S.C. § 1782 permits a district court to authorize a private foreign party to serve Rule 45 subpoenas for “pre-suit discovery” — to develop unpleaded foreign-law claims against a U.S. resident — in aid of a putative civil action it says it will file in the “conventional courts” of a foreign jurisdiction, where no administrative or quasi-judicial proceeding affords the applicant “significant procedural rights.”
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Edward Daniel Altabet
Brach Eichler
For respondent
Karen R. King
Morvillo Abramowitz Grand Iason & Anello P.C.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Aug 20 2026Reply of petitioners Dr. Douglas Schottenstein, et al. filed. (Distributed)
- Aug 19 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Aug 05 2026Brief of respondent Orthogen International GmbH in opposition filed.
- Jun 29 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 5, 2026)