Ryan P. Givey v. Todd Blanche, Attorney General, et al.

Never before in the history of this country has it been in dispute that a citizen has Constitutional Right to make a criminal complaint. PETITIONER is an attacked whistleblower and the same agents from Biden’s DOJ, who still work at the DOJ, have refused to take a criminal complaint for years, so there is no record of PETITIONER’S complaint. PETITIONER’S post office mail to Pamela Bondi and Kash Patel were illegally intercepted at the post office and not delivered. An Assistant US Attorney has been blocking PETITIONER from making a criminal complaint for years, including concerning his own conduct, refused to refer a Motion to Disqualify to the DOJ Office of General Counsel, he personally responded in district court and simply ignored the motion before the Third Circuit, in violation of the DOJ policy manual and rules of appellate procedure. PETITIONER believes there is evidence that agents from Biden’s DOJ, who still work at the DOJ, are hiding lawsuits from Trump’s appointments at the DOJ, allowing ongoing serious crimes to continue unobstructed and allowing whistleblowers to be threatened and harmed.

1. Is it a violation of a citizen’s First Amendment Rights for the Department of Justice to refuse to speak to a victim, review evidence and take criminal complaint of ongoing crimes, so there is no record of the complaint? 2. Is it a violation of federal law under 18 U.S.C. § 3332(a) for the Department of Justice to refuse to refer ongoing federal crimes to a grand jury?

2. Is it a Due Process violation for an Assistant United States Attorney to prevent a victim from making a criminal complaint concerning the Assistant United States Attorney’s own conduct?

3. Is it a Due Process violation for a federal judge to prevent a victim from making a criminal complaint concerning the judge’s own conduct?

4. Is it a Due Process violation for a federal judge to permit federal crimes to be committed to interfere with the court case before them? (Such as interfering with court mail, threatening and harming witnesses, interfering with PETITIONER obtaining legal counsel and interfering with PETITIONER’S phone to interfere with PETITIONER contacting journalists, lawyers and printers for his US Supreme Court petitions.)

5. Is it a Due Process violation for an Assistant United States Attorney to ignore a motion to disqualify and file a brief for Respondents without responding to the motion to disqualify?

6. Is it a Due Process violation for the Third Circuit’s opinion to arbitrarily dismiss a Merits Panel investigation into a judge’s conduct, filed under a motion to disqualify a judge?