Reginald Johnson v. City of Satsuma, Alabama, et al.

Whether the City of Satsuma, acting in concert with Maurice Kirk Harless, individually and collectively, under color of law, deprived the plaintiff of the equal treatment/protection of the law as guaranteed by the Constitution under 42 USC §1983 by engaging in inequitable and racially discriminatory conduct, and subjecting plaintiff to discrimination and differential treatment in violation of the Equal Protection Clause such as being singled out and treated differently compared to all other persons within the city of Satsuma because of race, and color of skin. Whether the lower court used an unfair application of the laws, and unconsciously integrated racial bias as compared to examining the elements of the claim to determine if the legal standards for this 42 USC §1983 claims were met? Whether the lower court get it wrong in denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Equal Protection of the Law as it relates to the Civil Rights Claims Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983?