Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Mark DuHall v. Michael Samuels, et al.
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Colorado, No. 2025SC547 · judgment September 10, 2025
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
The question presented for review is whether the Colorado Courts of Appeals may dismiss an appeal pursuant to a court-made rule, C.A.R. 4(a), because the e-filed notice of appeal was filed at 12:02 am the day after the notice was due. The Courts of Appeal denied a motion to recall the mandate, and the Colorado Supreme Court denied a motion for an extension of time to file a petition out of time and dismissed the appeal on September 10, 2025.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Mark DuHall
For respondent
Michael R. McCurdy
Fairfield and Woods, P.C.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Jun 29 2026Rehearing DENIED.
- Jun 09 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2026.
- May 29 2026Petition for Rehearing filed.
- May 18 2026Petition DENIED.
- May 14 2026Reply of petitioner Mark DuHall filed.
- Apr 28 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/14/2026.
- Apr 10 2026Brief of respondents Michael Samuels, et al. in opposition filed.
- Mar 18 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 10, 2026.
- Mar 13 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 20, 2026 to April 10, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
- Dec 09 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 20, 2026)