Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

James T. Weiss v. United States

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 23-3094 · judgment August 28, 2025


Certiorari denied · February 23, 2026
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

In Michigan v. Summers, 452 U. S. 692, 704–05 (1981), this Court held that pursuant to a lawfully executed search warrant, officers have a limited authority to detain an individual during the search. However, this Court did not address the issue of custodial interrogation during such a detention. See United States v. Kim, 292 F.3d 969, 976 (CA9 2002). This Court also has not provided “criteria for identifying “special circumstances” for determining when a detention is “prolonged”; in particular, it fails to tell law enforcement officers whether a detention will always be permissible, however protracted, so as it does not exceed the length of the search ***.” See Summers, 452 U. S. at 712 (Stewart J. dissenting, Brennan and Marshall JJ., joined). This case tests whether federal agents exceeded this limited authority when they detained and then interrogated the target of a search warrant for one hour and forty-minutes without reading him his rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona by presenting the following questions:

  1. Whether police officers executing a search warrant must provide Miranda warnings to an individual who is detained pursuant to the search warrant and interrogated?

  2. What are the criteria for identifying “special circumstances” or for determining when a detention is “prolonged” in relation to a search warrant detention?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Ilia Usharovich

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Feb 23 2026
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Feb 04 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
  3. Jan 26 2026
    Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
  4. Jan 16 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 20, 2026)