Daniel Otu v. Anita Whyte-Otu

l. Does a court of law violate the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause when the issuance of a permanent protective order relies on the Petitioner's violation of conditions and terms from a prior temporary protective judicial order that is effectively facially unenforceable, void, invalid, and legally inoperative?

1. Whether federal firearm prohibitions under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) constitutionally apply— consistent with the Second Amendment as interpreted in United States v. Rahimi—when the underlying permanent protective order was predicated on an alleged violation of terms and conditions of unenforceable, void, and invalid prior TPO judicial order and was not lawfully and constitutionally issued?

2. Does a_ state court violate’ the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause when it summarily denies a motion to dismiss a permanent protective order within three days—which restricts permanent freedom rights, parental rights and triggers federal firearm prohibitions—without granting a hearing, considering newly discovered evidence, or providing findings of fact and conclusions of law to support its decision?