Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Joseph Leslie McClory v. Scott Hobbs
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, No. B327202 · judgment October 24, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
The JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA (“JCC”) is the rule-making arm of the CALIFORNIA court system.1 In accordance with the California Constitution and under the leadership of the CHIEF JUSTICE of the SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA (“SCC”), the council is responsible for "ensuring the consistent, • - independent, impartial, and accessible administration of justice." It was created by an amendment to Article VI of the California Constitution in 1926 (2).2 Form APP003 APPELLANT'S NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL (UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE) was approved for use by JCC. The important Federal question presented is: If a rule-making arm of a state court system, including but not limited to the JCC, approves a form for use (regardless if optional or not) to designate the record on appeal, should the Appellant be penalized and/or forfeit important right(s), should that form end up being deficient and/or otherwise contain one or more omission(s)? 1 NASD Dispute Resolution, Inc. v. Judicial Council, 232 F. Supp. 2d 1055 (N.D. Cal. 2002) 2 Senate Constitutional Amendment No. 15, Chapter 48, Statutes of California 1925, pp. 1369-1370! Proposition 27, November 2, 1926 A. D.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Joseph Leslie McClory
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- May 19 2026Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner.
- Mar 23 2026Petition DENIED.
- Feb 25 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2026.
- Sep 16 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 12, 2026)