Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Tirza Diaz de Villegas v. Ulysses Diaz de Villegas
IFP petition · District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District, No. 3D2024-1369 · judgment February 25, 2026
Questions presented
-
Whether the effective deprivation of meaningful parent-child contact without meaningful appellate review violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
Whether a state appellate court’s per curiam affirmance without written opinion may effectively shield constitutional parental-rights claims from meaningful review.
-
Whether newly discovered post-trial evidence materially contradicting factual representations relied upon in restricting parental contact warrants constitutional review where state courts declined to consider such evidence.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Tirza Diaz de Villegas
For respondent
Christopher William Rumbold
Law Offce of Christopher W. Rumboid, PLLC
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jul 30 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Jul 29 2026Waiver of right of respondent Ulysses Diaz de Villegas to respond filed.
- May 12 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2026)