Michael Washington, et ux. v. United States, et al.

Whether the Eleventh Circuit’s "anomalous rule" for intervention appeals violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment by dismissing prospective intervenors for lack of jurisdiction without first reviewing the merits of their right to intervene under Fed. R. Civ. P. 24.

Whether a party who is adversely affected by a filing injunction issued against a co-litigant possesses "appellate standing" as an aggrieved party under the standards set forth in Marino v. Ortiz, 484 U.S. 301 (1988).