Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Hadarou Sare v. Central Collection Unit, et al.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 25-1890 · judgment December 22, 2025
Questions presented
(Rule 14.1(a))
-
Whether a public university and state collection agencies violate the Fourteenth Amendment when they terminate a fellowship and impose state debt without providing meaningful pre-deprivation process.
-
Whether the Eleventh Amendment bars prospective declaratory and injunctive relief under Ex parte Young where state officials are engaged in ongoing constitutional violations.
-
Whether a federal court may dismiss a pro se plaintiff’s due-process claims at the Rule 12(b)(6) stage by resolving disputed factual issues against the plaintiff without discovery.
-
Whether summary affirmance without addressing controlling Supreme Court precedent conflicts with this Court’s Due Process jurisprudence under Mathews v. Eldridge, Goss v. Lopez, and Ex parte Young. 2| Page
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Hadarou Sare
For respondent
Joshua Morris Segal
Office of the Attorney General
Case
Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 5, 2026 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 05 2026Petition DENIED.
- Jul 16 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Jul 10 2026Waiver of right of respondent Cent. Collection Unit, et al. to respond filed.
- Jan 05 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 13, 2026)