Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Hadarou Sare v. Central Collection Unit, et al.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 25-1890 · judgment December 22, 2025
Questions presented
(Rule 14.1(a))
-
Whether a public university and state collection agencies violate the Fourteenth Amendment when they terminate a fellowship and impose state debt without providing meaningful pre-deprivation process.
-
Whether the Eleventh Amendment bars prospective declaratory and injunctive relief under Ex parte Young where state officials are engaged in ongoing constitutional violations.
-
Whether a federal court may dismiss a pro se plaintiff’s due-process claims at the Rule 12(b)(6) stage by resolving disputed factual issues against the plaintiff without discovery.
-
Whether summary affirmance without addressing controlling Supreme Court precedent conflicts with this Court’s Due Process jurisprudence under Mathews v. Eldridge, Goss v. Lopez, and Ex parte Young. 2| Page
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Hadarou Sare
For respondent
Joshua Morris Segal
Office of the Attorney General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jul 16 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Jul 10 2026Waiver of right of respondent Cent. Collection Unit, et al. to respond filed.
- Jan 05 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 13, 2026)