Djavon Holland v. United States

) Whether the Sixth Amendment, Due Process, and Fundamentd:l^^^^|e^| Clause, require that a criminal appellant be afforded a meaningful, timely opportunity to review any appellate brief proposed to be filed on his behalf before the brief is filed?

) Whether filing an opening brief, without first ensuring that appellate counsel gave the defendant an adequate and informed opportunity to review the brief and decide whether to file the brief or proceed pro se violates fundamental fairness, due process, and the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution?

) Whether 28 U.S.C. § 1654 gives a defendant the right to proceed pro se on direct appeal?

) Whether the Third Circuit's delay in deciding whether Mr. Holland shall proceed pro se is causing an unnecessary delay, prejudice, and irreparable harm, in violation of fundamental fairness, and the due process clause of the United States Constitution? I.