Howard E. Martin, III v. Garry Galloway, Warden, et al.

Foremost considering that access to the Court is a Right, where is the Justice, for an Incarcerated Petitioner who.is denied an opportunity to present an exculpatory evidence legal strategy for Due Process of lhe Law, by the alleged obstruction ofjustice of the district court, when they foil to grant the Petitioner Justice, when justice and subversive corruption were the two divergent options, for every person who, und^ color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any state or territory, within foe jurisdiction there of to foe deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by foe Constitution and foe Laws? This question arose when foie Petitioner in a Court of Common Pleas case faced injustice and then that same injustice occurred during foe Appeal Process. This meant foe Petitioner whom is now in a Plaintiff position is required to content in foe District Court without the ostensible aid of counsel as their constitutionally protected interest due to their durance restriction. Moreover, a Justice System that deliberately proliferates deception and corruption with Neo-cheating and Non-sequiturs in an effort to abuse foe rule of law to oppress foe American Citizens is not a system that exemplifies foe Spiritual Substance of Rectitude for foe Service bf Justice. Which is further Elucidated in Appendix ‘H’ RECEIVED FEB 1 8 2026