David George Karkour v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

1—Whether the non-consensual injection of "undercover implants" (See App. E-l to E-l 1) that remain persistently active for over 16 years—and are "reloaded" through medical injectables, eye drops, waterproof bandages, and tampered food—constitutes a Continuous Physical Trespass that falls outside the scope of Sovereign Immunity. 2— Whether a matter involving the covert, systemic monitoring and torture of an innocent citizen can be dismissed as “frivolous” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (App. D-3 to D-5) in direct conflict with Nietzke v. Williams 490 U.S. 319 (1989) and Denton v. Hernandez 504 U.S. 25 (1992). 3— Whether the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and Article III (See App. D-7) of the Constitution are violated when a Court of Appeals Clerk implements a "clerical blockade"—utilizing administrative tags such as "[No action necessary]" (See App. F-l, F-2) to suppress timely-filed petitions for rehearing—thereby indefinitely bypassing the mandatoiy stay required by FRAP 41(b) (See App. D-6, D-7) and permanently obstructing a Petitioner’s right to judicial review under the standards of Mathews v. Eldridge 424 U.S. 319 (1976) and Grannis v. Ordean234 U.S. 385(1914).