Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Christopher John Badsey v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 24-5365 · judgment October 9, 2025
Question presented
Did the district court violate 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) and Petitioner’s right to due process, by not recusing itself sua sponte for sentencing, where the district court was the direct victim of Petitioner’s obstructive conduct prior to sentencing? PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS Petitioner (appellant in the court of appeals): Christopher John Badsey. Respondent (appellee in the court of appeals): The United States of America. LIST OF PROCEEDINGS Petitioner was indicted in the Central District of California in United States v. Christopher John Badsey, Case No. 21-CR-00124-JLS, and charged with four
-
counts of wire fraud, and two (2) counts of money laundering under 18 U.S.C §
-
He pled guilty to counts 1-4 and was sentenced to 87 months incarceration. Petitioner appealed to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit, Case No. 23-765. Judgment was affirmed on October 9, 2025 (Dkt. 35.1), and Petitioner’s rehearing petition was denied on January 29, 2026. Dkt. 37.1. See Appx. at 6-7.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Kenneth M. Miller
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jun 22 2026Petition DENIED.
- Jun 03 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2026.
- May 29 2026Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Apr 06 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 17, 2026)