Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Kevin Cassaday v. Kelli Cassaday, aka Kelli Brozanski
IFP petition · Circuit Court of Michigan, Eaton County, No. 21-938-DO · judgment March 16, 2022
Questions presented
-
Whether a State may allow a divorce judgment and related property disposition to proceed against an incarcerated self-represented party after receiving actual notice of his incarceration and inability to appear, where jail officials allegedly prevented his attendance at scheduled hearings and the trial court proceeded without first providing meaningful opportunity to be heard.
-
Whether due process and the constitutional right of access to the courts are violated when state courts decline meaningful merits review of a family-status judgment entered after the State had notice that the litigant was incarcerated, objecting that he was being blocked from participating in his own case, and contemporaneously subject to federal competency proceedings.
-
Whether a State may rely on default, waiver, or nonappearance principles to sustain a family-status judgment where the record shows that the litigant timely objected, sought adjournment, and asserted that state custodial actors were preventing his participation. Page 2 of 19
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Kevin William Cassaday
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jul 02 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Apr 27 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 15, 2026)