Oneil Allen, aka Allen Oneil v. United States

Whether, for a person to be liable as an accomplice for a substantive narcotics sale arranged and consummated by another, the person must have (a) knowledge that the specific sale will occur and (b) provide aid to further that specific sale.

Whether, absent a Pinkerton charge [Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 840 (1946)], a co-conspirator can be liable for a substantive crime committed by another co-conspirator even though the alleged accomplice did not have actual knowledge of the substantive crime and did not personally participate in the acts constituting it.

Whether the intent element of accomplice liability must be based on the accomplice’s advance knowledge of the substantive crime to be committed by a co-defendant, even when the crime is not a “double-barreled” one requiring two actions, as was the 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) offense at issue in Rosemond v. United States, 572 U.S. 65, 71 (2014).