In Re Patrick Starzenski

41 42 First Question n: 43 (3 sentences - 201 words) 44 U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi is proceeding Habeas Corpus near 300 45 days. This is 10 times longer than statutory provisions for this kind of procedure (28 USCS 2241- 46 2244), and what's more party in the case and authorities in the court are still detaining me in this detention 47 completely without any reason, any violation of the law, without any reaction, and despite it everything is 48 showed and proved in the court of the law. This question is risen because they should already order (and 49 really also release me from detention), but authorities are not respecting and following these laws and 50 provisions (which is a fact regarding this time frames), and they allow custodian to sharing lies, 51 threatening, scaring, robbing, stressing, targeting, falsely charging and accusing for fictional violations 52 which never happened (what is showed and proved in statement). And this question is for determination 53 why and if they are above to the law and have permission to commit illegal or even criminal 54 commitments in this jurisdiction from government of the United States of America, and if this permission 55 is to treat people inhumanly and seizing them and their properties and keeping in custody without any 56 reasons and indefinitely. 57 58 59 Second Question 60 (3 sentences - 202 words) 61 Opposing party really long time lengthen detention without reason and even authority when 62 conform with statute (habeas corpus) court should act forthwith and order to show cause of detention 63 within 3 days (for good reason can extend this time to 20 days maximum) and after this step is supposed 64 to set a hearing date and order within next 5 days. But U.S. District Court did give to the party in case 7 65 months to show cause of detention (firstly 5 months lengthening and later allowing offenders to respond 66 in 60 days instead 3 and even instead maximum allowed 20 days), and this time opposing party used to 67 conspire and to prepare fictional and false documentation and reason of detention and they did wrote lies, 68 false statements, and did defame me in the court of the law in result of having this additional extra time. 69 What's more, court of the law didn't set a hearing, didn't order in this Habeas Corpus procedure despite 70 since November 29, 2025 (date: submitted response with cause of detention) have been gone already near 71 4 months. This question is for determination how many time really court may proceed Habeas Corpus 72 regarding unreasonable and unlawful detention in these circumstances. 73 74 75 76 2 OF 40