Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Hira Uddin v. Texana Behavioral Healthcare & Development Services, dba Texana Center, et al.
IFP petition · Supreme Court of Texas, No. 25-0538 · judgment July 25, 2025
Questions presented
-
Whether the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 2, and the Supremacy Clause prohibit a state court from compelling or enforcing arbitration after the opposing party has waived its right to arbitrate through litigation conduct inconsistent with an intent to arbitrate.
-
Whether a state court violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by compelling arbitration without a showing of mutual assent and by disposing of preserved federal objections through an unreasoned denial that forecloses meaningful judicial review.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Hira Uddin
For respondent
William S. Helfand
Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Jul 20 2026Waiver of right of respondent Texana Behavioral Healthcare & Development Services, dba Texana Center to respond filed.
- Jul 16 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Jul 08 2026Petitioner complied with order of June 29, 2026
- Jun 29 2026The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until July 20, 2026, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
- Jun 10 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2026.
- Dec 10 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 29, 2026)