Jason William Lang v. Hillary R. Clinton, et al.

Whether the government’s use of warrantlessj surveillance under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), including! the submission of surveillance applications misleadingly labeled as “FISA warrants,” violates the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures when targeting U.S. persons.

Whether the government’s surveillance activities under 50 U.S.C. § 702 (FISA Section

against American citizens without probable cause, individualized suspicion, or judicial oversight constitute an unlawful search under the Fourth Amendment.

Whether the government’s conduct in surveilling U.S. persons under 50 U.S.C. § 1881a, contrary to its statutory limitations, violates the FISA Amendments Act when no valid basis existed to target a U.S. citizen.

Whether a federal judge must recuse herself under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) and (b)(1) when she was nominated to the federal bench by a defendant in the same case, creating an appearance of partiality and potential personal bias—particularly where another judge previously recused under identical circumstances and where the court of appeals erroneously found that the judge was not appointed by the litigant-President.