Abid Naseer v. United States

After succeeding in vacating a 40 year sentence on §2255, Naseer had the remainder of his terms restructured to increase his term of incarceration. This was done with none of the requirements of due process - appointment of counsel, hearing, or a new P.S.R. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld this as a "purely min­ isterial" sentence "correction." What is the difference between a "sentencing correction," which does not require a hearing, and a "resentencing," which does? Where is the line between them? Should a judge on §2255 be able to increase or restructure remaining counts after vacatur without a hearing?