Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Pierre C. Marc v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 24-12378 · judgment November 21, 2025
Questions presented
-
Whether due process permits a conviction for a charged drug and threshold quantity 5 kilograms or more of cocaine, 21 U. S. C.§841 (a) (1), (b) (1) (A) when the Government's trial evidence proved only a different controlled substance (fentanyl) and no cocaine, and the jury nonetheless returned a verdict finding '5 kilograms or more of cocaine."
-
"Whether a federal court of appeals may affirm a conviction by declining to review the sufficiency of the evidence because the defendant did not renew a Rule 29 motion after the Government's case, where the record reflects a complete failure of proof on an element (identity of the controlled substance and threshold drug quantity element)."
-
"Whether, at minimum, the court of appeals must review such a claim for plain error or to prevent a manifest miscarriage of justice, rather than treating it as unreviewable or forfeited."
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Pierre C. Marc
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- May 04 2026Petition DENIED.
- Apr 16 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2026.
- Apr 07 2026Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Mar 05 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 4, 2026)