Jaquan Hall v. Ohio

“.. .Due Process...”

1. In a criminal case, when the prosecution introduce evidence at trial where law enforcement cannot identify or verify the evidence’s original source, how does this deprive a defendants’ due process and confrontation clause?

2. In a grandjury hearing, when witness statements are used to obtain an indictment, then later to be falsely reported by investigators, are these violations to the 6th and 14th Amendment?

3. When a DNA search warrant contained the wrong crime, social security, and identification for the accused, does this constitute a due process violation and a 4th Amendment violation? “...Fair Trial...”

4. If evidence presented to, and deliberated upon by a jury, were later discovered to have been obtained pursuant to defective and unlawful warrants, has the defendant been deprived their 4th, 5th, and 14th Amendment rights as a U.S. Citizen?

5. During trial, if warrants that led to an indictment was discovered to contain false statements for probable cause, is this a violation to the 5th Amendment?

6. When a judge becomes aware of physical evidence that materially contradicts the testimony of a witness, who received a plea agreement contingent upon truthful testimony, does allowing that testimony to stand constitutes a fair trial violation?

7. Where, during individual voir dire, many prospective jurors had expressed that a defendant should try their case in a different county, due to racial bias and community prejudice, and the defense moves for a change of venue, does denying that motion deprive the defendant a fair trial, the 6th Amendment, and an abuse of the judicial discretion? Could then, a defendant question a grand jury’s ability to be impartial*! “...Unreasonable Searches and Seizers...”

8. When a jail becomes aware of an ongoing investigation for a criminal case, when does “jail policy” shift to Constitutional protected rights for pretrial detainees?