Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Hasna Bashir Iwas v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 24-1234 · judgment October 20, 2025
Question presented
I. Is authorization under the Controlled Substances Act defined in terms of the regulatory definition of an effective prescription or by the plain meaning of the statutory text? II. Does the mens rea required under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) and this Court’s opinion in Ruan attach to the fact of non-authorization or to the regulatory standard for an effective prescription contained in 21 C.F.R. § 1306.04? LIST OF PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS Petitioner, defendant-appellant below, Hasna Bashir Iwas. Respondent is the United States of America, appellee below. RELATED PROCEEDINGS Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals: United States v. Iwas, No. 24-1234, 2025 WL 2955197, at *1 (6th Cir. Oct. 20, 2025) Mandate Issued December 11, 2025. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan: United States v. Iwas, No 2:18-cr-20769LJM-RSW-5. Judgement and conviction entered March 19, 2024.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Beau B. Brindley
The Law Offices of Beau B. Brindley
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 20 2026Petition DENIED.
- Apr 02 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2026.
- Mar 27 2026Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Mar 11 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 16, 2026)