Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Dawn Marie Guevara v. United States

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 24-5722 · judgment November 6, 2025


Certiorari denied · March 30, 2026

Question presented

The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment provides that “in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be confronted with the witnesses against him.” This Clause guarantees a defendant the right to confront those “who ‘bear testimony’ against her.” Crawford v. Washington, 41 U.S. 36, 51 (2004). A witness's testimony is thus inadmissible unless the witness appears at trial or, if the witness is unavailable, the defendant had a prior opportunity for crossexamination. Id., at 54. Confrontation Clause violations are reviewed for harmless error. The following question is presented: 1. Whether a reviewing court can properly conclude a confrontation clause violation is harmless when it fails to consider the impact of the erroneously admitted evidence on the jury’s verdict?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Nancy G. Schwartz
N.G. Schwartz Law, PLLC

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Linked docket
25A858

Proceedings

  1. Mar 30 2026
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Mar 12 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2026.
  3. Mar 04 2026
    Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
  4. Jan 30 2026
    Application (25A858) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until April 5, 2026.
  5. Jan 30 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2026)
  6. Jan 22 2026
    Application (25A858) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 4, 2026 to April 5, 2026, submitted to Justice Kagan.