Imre Kifor v. Massachusetts, et al.

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts aims to “double protect”1 some citizens at the expense of revoking all protections from others, including Constitutional rights. Does “double protecting” some waive Constitutional protections for all?

Do any immunities apply to an “LGBTQ+” Massachusetts when using federal “reimbursements” to subsidize forceful separation and agenda-driven extreme alienation2 of innocent American children from their loving American parents? 1 See “State Constitutional Law Declares Its Independence: Double Protecting Rights During a Time of Federal Constitutional Upheaval” by Scott L. Kafker, Associate Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, as published at https://reDository.uclawsf.edu/ hastings constitutional law quaterly/vol49/iss2/4/ and also attached herein in Appendix E. 2 See the “Parental Alienation Can Be Emotional Child Abuse” NCSC article in Appendix B. - ii -