Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Brandon Frank Stricker v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 24-5955 · judgment August 15, 2025
Question presented
Whether, under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, a district court is required to conduct a more searching inquiry into a defendant’s understanding of how his admitted conduct satisfies the essential elements of the offense when the defendant denies a substantial portion of the government’s offer of proof (including the essential element) during the plea colloquy, or whether the court may instead rely on counsels’ summary assertions that the remaining admitted conduct is sufficient to support the plea.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Brandon Frank Stricker
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Mar 23 2026Petition DENIED.
- Mar 05 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2026.
- Feb 27 2026Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Dec 08 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 25, 2026)