Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Laurence Sessum v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 24-6259, 24-6689 · judgment July 8, 2025
Questions presented
-
Whether this Court’s contemporaneous-evidence requirement from Lee v. United States, 582 U.S. 357 (2017), applies only to accepted-plea cases and is therefore inapplicable to rejected-plea ineffective-assistance claims governed by Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 156 (2012), and Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 134 (2012).
-
Whether the Fourth Circuit violated the Sixth Amendment and the Certificate-ofAppealability standard in Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 100 (2017), by denying a COA despite (a) factual disputes requiring an evidentiary hearing, (b) evidence supporting deficient performance and prejudice under Strickland, Lafler, and Frye, and (c) a ruling conflicting with United States v. Brown, No. 22-7105 (4th Cir. May 20, 2025), and the sister-circuit precedents relied on in Brown, creating a Rule 10(a) conflict.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Laurence Sessum
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Mar 23 2026Petition DENIED.
- Feb 26 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2026.
- Feb 20 2026Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Dec 15 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 19, 2026)