Cornell Clisby v. United States

QUESTON NUMBER ONE; Whether the Sixth Circuit and the district court abused its discretion by failing to hold that extraordinary and compelling reasons existed to qualify him for a reduced federal sentence, thus, the Honorable U.S. Supreme Court should VACATE and REMAND for reconsideration in the case herein. QUESTION NUMBER TWO; Whether the Sixth Circuit and the district court abused its discretion by failing to consider all factors in conjunction with his post-sentencing rehabilitation efforts to constitute "extraordinary and compelling reasons" to render him eligible for a reduced federal sentence, thus, the Honorable U.S. Supreme Court should VACATE and REMAND for reconsideration in the case at bar.