Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Adedayo Abioye v. Mojisola Braimoh, et al.
IFP petition · Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, No. C104433 · judgment August 21, 2025
Questions presented
Federal statute of the United States Code - 18 U.S.C. § 1014, prohibits making a (misleading or) “false statement” for the purpose of influencing certain small business investment corporations, financial institutions, any person or entity that makes in whole or in part a federally related mortgage loan as defined in section 3 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974. This case presents the following questions:
-
Is it legal for entities (fiduciaries or a non-fiduciaries) to engage in heinous criminally tortious conduct that affects many victims?
-
Will the courts allow entities to illegally violate individuals that entities are meant to care for (with a fiduciary’s standard of care or an ordinary duty of care)?
-
Can a person/entity be held accountable for his/her/it’s false and misleading statements that have caused damages and have established a precedent that influences others and causes limitless damages to other victims?
-
Should the U.S. Supreme Court review the court cases that have been unfairly prolonged due to the defendants’ (threatening and intimidating) criminally tortious conduct towards me and the courts? Petition for Writ of Certiorari
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Adedayo Abioye
For respondent
Thomas John Schetelich
Ferguson, Schetelich, et al.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 20 2026Petition DENIED.
- Apr 02 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2026.
- Mar 05 2026Brief of Mojisola Braimoh, et al. in opposition not accepted for filing. (To be corrected - March 18, 2026)
- Mar 05 2026Brief of respondent Mojisola Braimoh, et al. in opposition filed. (Corrected - April 1, 2026)
- Jan 23 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 5, 2026)