Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Evelyn R. Benton v. Berkshire Richmond LLC
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 24-2122
Questions presented
-
The Record less Review: Whether a United States Court of Appeals violates the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and acts in excess of its jurisdiction by issuing a summary affirmance while the official appellate docket confirms the court never received, docketed, or possessed the original record of proceedings required by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 10(a).
-
The Phantom Record: Whether a structural error occurs, rendering an appellate judgment void, when a Chief Judge’s order denying misconduct complaints asserts a "personal review" of the record (App. D-l, 24a), yet the official court record reflects a status of "Record Requested-No Receipt" (App. C-l, 19a; App. C-2, 21a), thereby creating a "phantom record" that precludes meaningful adversarial review.
-
The Lack of Magistrate Con sent: Whether the Fourth Circuit sanctioned a grave departure from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings by affirming a dismissal "with prejudice" where the underlying judgment was facilitated and entered by a Magistrate Judge without the express written consent of the parties required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and without the issuance of a Report and Recommendation under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Evelyn Benton
For respondent
Jason Richard Waters
Wilson Elser Markowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Mar 30 2026Petition DENIED.
- Mar 12 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2026.
- Feb 24 2026Waiver of right of respondent Berkshire Richmond, LLC to respond filed.
- Dec 03 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 5, 2026)