Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Isaac Ramirez Rodriguez v. Virginia
IFP petition · Supreme Court of Virginia, No. 250129 · judgment September 15, 2025
Question presented
This Court has ruled that a criminal sentence must be proportionate to the crime for which the defendant has been convicted. The question presented is: Are the mandatory minimum life sentence provisions of Virginia Code §§ 18.2-61(B)(2) and 18.2-67.2(B)(2) unconstitutional as constituting Cruel and Unusual Punishment prohibited by the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, making the mandatory minimum sentence of two life sentences plus 60 years plus 12 months imposed upon Petitioner in this case unconstitutionally disproportionate to the particular crimes for which he was convicted and unconstitutional. LIST OF PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING The Petitioner (the respondent-appellant below) is Isaac Ramirez Rodriguez, who was born in 1985 and is now imprisoned in a facility of the Virginia Department of Corrections as a result of this case for two (2) life sentences plus 60 years plus 12 months as a result of convictions for sexual offenses against a juvenile female who was raised as his daughter and was born in 2005, with an offense date range from 2016 to 2021. The Respondent (the defendant-appellee below) is the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
James Chandler Martin
Martin & Martin Law Firm
For respondent
Ethan Padilla Fallon
Virginia Office of the Attorney General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 23 2026Petition DENIED.
- Feb 05 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
- Jan 30 2026Waiver of right of respondent Virginia to respond filed.
- Jan 22 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 2, 2026)