Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Noah P. Healy v. John A. Squires, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2024-2311 · judgment August 7, 2025
Question presented
Whether an Article III court may affirm an administrative agency decision while dismissing unrebutted record evidence as “unpersuasive,” without providing any explanation sufficient to permit meaningful judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act. Whether an Article III court may affirm an administrative agency decision that rests on contradictory statutory determinations, without reconciling those inconsistencies or providing an explanation sufficient to permit meaningful judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Noah P. Healy
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Mar 23 2026Petition DENIED.
- Feb 26 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2026.
- Feb 20 2026Waiver of right of respondent Squires, John A. to respond filed.
- Jan 15 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 23, 2026)