Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

In Re Joey Lamont Brunson

IFP petition

Certiorari denied · February 23, 2026

Questions presented

  1. ) WAS THE DISTRICT COURT'S ASSERTION OF "SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION" VALID AFTER JURISDICTION WAS CHALLENGED UNDER F.R.CR.P. RULE 12(b)(2), REGARDING THE "USE" OF ILLEGALLY OBTAINED WIRETAP EVIDENCE; IN VIOLATION OF STATUTORY LAW OF TITLE III, 18 U.S.C.§2515 and FIFTH AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS RIGHTS? 2.) DID THE DISTRICT COURT'S USE OF "GOOD FAITH EXCEPTION" OF LEON, CONFER "SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION" IN SPITE OF THE "CLEAR STATEMENT RULE" IN TITLE III, 18 U.S.C. §2510 et. seq. AND CONFLICT WITH RELEVANT DECISIONS OF THIS COURT IN DAHDA V. UNITED STATES, 584 U.S. 440 (2018) UNDER RULE 10(c) OF SUPREME COURT?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Joey L. Brunson

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Feb 23 2026
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jan 22 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
  3. Dec 08 2025
    Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
    Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service