Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Melvon Adams v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 24-1339 · judgment July 22, 2025
Question presented
Some lower courts hold that even when extraordinary circumstances prevent a defendant’s timely filing of a notice of appeal in a criminal case, Rule 4(b) requires mandatory dismissal upon the government’s motion to dismiss for timeliness. The Question Presented here is whether Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)’s timelimitations for the filing of a criminal appeal, which are non-jurisdictional, are subject to equitable tolling even after the government objects to untimeliness, consistent with this Court’s equitable tolling jurisprudence.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Michelle Barth
Law Office of Michelle Anderson Barth
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 23 2026Petition DENIED.
- Jan 29 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
- Jan 26 2026Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Jan 12 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 17, 2026)