Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Melvon Adams v. United States

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 24-1339 · judgment July 22, 2025


Certiorari denied · February 23, 2026

Question presented

Some lower courts hold that even when extraordinary circumstances prevent a defendant’s timely filing of a notice of appeal in a criminal case, Rule 4(b) requires mandatory dismissal upon the government’s motion to dismiss for timeliness. The Question Presented here is whether Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)’s timelimitations for the filing of a criminal appeal, which are non-jurisdictional, are subject to equitable tolling even after the government objects to untimeliness, consistent with this Court’s equitable tolling jurisprudence.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Michelle Barth
Law Office of Michelle Anderson Barth

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Feb 23 2026
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jan 29 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
  3. Jan 26 2026
    Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
  4. Jan 12 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 17, 2026)