Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Esteban Burgos v. Florida
IFP petition · District Court of Appeals of Florida, Sixth District, No. 6D2023-1897 · judgment July 22, 2025
Questions presented
-
MAY A DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS, AND CIRCUIT COURT DISREGARD MANDATORY RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION ASSOCIATED WITH A SUPREME COURT ORDER?
-
ONCE A JUDGE IN A CIRCUIT COURT MAKES AN “ADMISSION IN JUDICIO” CONCERNING A VIOLATION OF THE SPEEDY TRIAL RULE, MAY THE COURT CONTINUE THE TRIAL ANYWAY?
-
MAY A JUDGE AND PROSECUTOR TAKE ACTION TO CIRCUMVENT A DEMAND FOR SPEEDY TRIAL UNDER R. CRIM. P. 3.191 (B) IN CIRCUIT COURT?
-
MAY A FLORIDA DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS VIOLATE IT’S OWN FLORIDA CONSTITUTION BY REFUSING TO PROVIDE AN OPINION ON A PER CURIAM AFFIRM DECISION WHILE A SUPREME COURT ORDER REQUIRES ONE?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Esteban Burgos
For respondent
Marilyn Frances Muir
Office of the Attorney General, State of Florida
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, February 23, 2026 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Feb 23 2026Petition DENIED.
- Feb 05 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
- Jan 29 2026Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
- Dec 08 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 11, 2026)