Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Esteban Burgos v. Florida
IFP petition · District Court of Appeals of Florida, Sixth District, No. 6D2023-1897 · judgment July 22, 2025
Questions presented
-
MAY A DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS, AND CIRCUIT COURT DISREGARD MANDATORY RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION ASSOCIATED WITH A SUPREME COURT ORDER?
-
ONCE A JUDGE IN A CIRCUIT COURT MAKES AN “ADMISSION IN JUDICIO” CONCERNING A VIOLATION OF THE SPEEDY TRIAL RULE, MAY THE COURT CONTINUE THE TRIAL ANYWAY?
-
MAY A JUDGE AND PROSECUTOR TAKE ACTION TO CIRCUMVENT A DEMAND FOR SPEEDY TRIAL UNDER R. CRIM. P. 3.191 (B) IN CIRCUIT COURT?
-
MAY A FLORIDA DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS VIOLATE IT’S OWN FLORIDA CONSTITUTION BY REFUSING TO PROVIDE AN OPINION ON A PER CURIAM AFFIRM DECISION WHILE A SUPREME COURT ORDER REQUIRES ONE?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Esteban Burgos
For respondent
Marilyn Frances Muir
Office of the Attorney General, State of Florida
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 23 2026Petition DENIED.
- Feb 05 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
- Jan 29 2026Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
- Dec 08 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 11, 2026)